Hoi, It only makes sense to do so when there is a public. It is not a hobby. Thanks, GerardM
On 6 June 2018 at 19:37, Michael Everson siorrai@evertype.com wrote:
I have no objection to a Roman alphabet version of editors wish to create one.
On 6 Jun 2018, at 16:17, Steven White Koala19890@hotmail.com wrote:
Khorasani Turkic (kmz): In theory, the language ought to be eligible.
But the test is written in a Romanized form, which neither Ethnologue nor the enwiki article shows as an ordinary variant. Thoughts?
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom