Hoi, The Cebuano proposal can be remedied in another way. The data can be imported in Wikidata and the generated text can be cached. As a consequence there is no such thing as poor quality in the Cebuano Wikipedia but it is poor quality in Wikidata. This idea has been floated quite a number of times but it is orthodoxy that prevents this from being considered. It means that the role of Wikidata changes substantially and it follows that it is not only Cebuano Wikipedia that would benefit.
I am sure that this can work, will work. The source the Cebuano Wikipedia used for its data is willing to collaborate on this. So we can do this, Thanks, GerardM
On 21 December 2017 at 21:53, Steven White Koala19890@hotmail.com wrote:
Dear colleagues:
As the end of the conventional calendar year approaches, and many of you may be going away for a bit to enjoy time with family and friends, I want to summarize what happened in 2017, as well as the tasks and issues I think are already pending and waiting for us at the beginning of 2018:
2017:
- Ten projects approved and created, the most in a single year since
- Another two projects simply await completion of the formal,
seven-day comment period at Meta before final approval. I expect both to have phabricator tasks open by year-end for their creation.
- Two other projects are tentatively approved, pending language
verification.
Specific issues currently open:
- Decision on the Nungar (Wikipedia) project
- Opening of a moderated discussion on Meta in Spanish about the
language issues at Nahuatl Wikipedia (action item: Maor)
- Language verification and final approvals of Ingush and Gorontalo
Wikipedias
Policy issues currently open:
- Creation of parallel projects in second scripts where a project
already exists: See my email of 5 Dec, 15:39 UTC https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/langcom/2017-December/001710.html
- Clarification on policy as to what conlangs (and, for that matter
historical languages) should be eligible: This is partly an outgrowth of the LFN approval, and partly an outgrowth of the longstanding requests by communities like the "Ancient Greek" community, especially given that LangCom has marked "Coptic" as approved.
New specific issues to be opened at the beginning of 2018:
- *Eligibility of Montenegrin Wikipedia. *Some media reports out of
Montenegro—and some correspondence between certain Wikimedians and SIL—suggest that a langcode for Montenegrin (cnr) will be published by SIL in the January 2018 approval release. Montenegrins are already screaming for their project. Although Montenegrin—and for that matter, Serbian, Croatian and Bosnian—are all mutually intelligible, I assume that if this code is, in fact, approved, then this project will be eligible. I'd like to get an early confirmation of that so that if and when the code is published, I can act promptly.
- *Proposal to close Cebuano Wikipedia
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Proposals_for_closing_projects/Closure_of_Cebuano_Wikipedia. *There is a proposal to remove all the bot-created content and port the rest of the project to Incubator. Given that cebwiki has over five million pages, that's absurd on its face. But some of the bot content is of poor quality. So I'm not sure what should happen with this proposal, or what we can/should do about it.
- *Merger of Beta Wikiversity into Incubator. *The most recent version
of this remains open. I think we should decide one way or the other if this is happening or not and be done with it.
- I will continue to introduce RFL requests that have been open for a
long time.
Happy new year to all!
Steven
Sent from Outlook http://aka.ms/weboutlook
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom