We don't, so that would be good.
Amir E. Aharoni amir.aharoni@mail.huji.ac.il schrieb am Mi., 11. Nov. 2020, 15:43:
Do we already have expert approval, by the way? If not, I may have someone to ask.
בתאריך יום ב׳, 9 בנוב׳ 2020, 04:49, מאת MF-Warburg < mfwarburg@googlemail.com>:
The activity of Wt/mni looks quite good:
https://meta.toolforge.org/catanalysis/index.php?cat=0&title=Wt/mni&... This is the 7th month of continuous activity as usually defined, and the project is semi-continuously active since mid-2018. The most-used msgs are almost complete: https://robin.toolforge.org/?tool=codelookup&code=mni
I'll add that the test-Wikipedia also has considerable activity: https://meta.toolforge.org/catanalysis/index.php?cat=0&title=Wp/mni&...
I propose to approve mni Wiktionary as the first project in that language, and hope that the Wikipedia can soon follow. Thoughts? _______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom