And turning bytes added into a competition was especially controversial, though it was one
of Frank Schulenberg's favourite devices: he had a "leaderboard" and all.
There is some discussion here:
.
In line with the WMF and the education program's tendency to take things off wiki
whenever they came upon disagreement, they then moved it to outreach (see
),
before eliminating the traces from en.wiki, replacing it with a meaningless redirect
elsewhere:
87269755.
Take care
Jon
On Jan 28, 2014, at 10:10 AM, Jami Mathewson <jami(a)wikiedfoundation.org> wrote:
Tighe makes a really great point that it seems like
normal student behavior to meet the bare minimum when possible. In the US and Canada, we
measure bytes as a program to evaluate how we're doing from semester to semester (has
our impact increased while our resources have stayed the same?). On a class level, though,
professors rarely mention bytes in their syllabus or grading rubric. When there is a
minimum length, it usually takes the form of "500 words" or "2
sections". I don't think the minimum length is inherently bad if the students are
otherwise set up to do great work (research, writing, understanding Wikipedia policies and
norms, etc.). If you can assume most of them are doing good work, then more content is
likely better.
Most of our professors probably don't grade in this way simply because they don't
know how to measure bytes contributed (it's not one of the training topics we cover).
Similarly, I haven't seen students trying to inflate their content contribution with
templates mostly because they don't know about them or how to use them (they're
new editors).
I really like the idea of making it more competitive, which we also did during the pilot
of the program in the US. Of course, then the professor ideally is savvy enough not to
count copy & paste from a sandbox into the article namespace when most of that content
existed before they worked on it (this was a problem we saw with our tool). Hopefully the
education extension will eventually tie WikiMetrics into it, which should make the content
quantity easier for students/professors to monitor and measure.
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 8:28 AM, Tighe Flanagan <tflanagan(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
This is definitely an interesting discussion that has been ongoing in the Arab world
education programs as well.
In Egypt, the program adopted a byte threshold/goal in most classes. Bytes do allow for
quick, surface level evaluation to see how much students are contributing. Our ambassadors
seem to appreciate having a benchmark for student contributions, but we have also gotten
pushback from the Arabic Wikipedian community fearing that the primary focus is quantity,
and not quality contributions (like Craig mentions). Most of our students in Egypt do
translation assignments, so it is often more important to select high quality content in
the other language, and ensure that students are not copying and pasting machine
translations and wikifying their contributions. I've noticed students in Egypt like
having a numeric goal more than their teachers do.
Here's an example course page from an English translation class at Ain Shams
University. You'll notice they set a 50kb threshold, and also have a section for
additional contributions of 5kb each. (To compare these numbers to English/latin scripts,
you should halve the bytes because of the Arabic script which "inflates" the
number):
Like all assignment guidelines, having a byte benchmark might be a necessary evil, just
like traditional writing assignments tend to have minimum word count or pages. Depends on
your context and goals. It would depend on the rest of the assignment and the rubric you
would use to evaluate the assignment. Giving more weight to proper writing style and
citations would probably be a good place to start.
Juliana, it does sound like you want your students to contribute more since they're
stopping when they reach the minimum. That sounds like normal student behavior. Would
there be a different way to motivate students to keep editing with extra points for going
beyond the minimum thresholds, for example? Or a competition for number of bytes, articles
created, citations added (they could all have different weights and be evaluated in
conjunction with quality checks).
I'd love to hear more thoughts on the topic since it's something I struggle with
as well!
Tighe
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 9:06 AM, Laura Hale <laura(a)fanhistory.com> wrote:
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 2:12 AM, Juliana Bastos Marques <domusaurea(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Has anyone used this approach? Pros/cons? What would you consider a reasonable number for
the minimum of bytes in the final article?
Juliana.
I have seen this done for classes, but the problem sometimes becomes students look at it
as a exercise in adding content but ignore Wikipedia guidelines. They end up adding essay
like material, add information that makes existing tags worse in order to add material
related to the course, etc.
Speculating, I would think a potential better criteria might be adding references to
uncited materials related to the topic as there is a lot of unsourced material. They
would be adding pure bytes by adding sources. It would also assist in making them more
familiar with other sources that you may think valuable for them to be aware of.
--
twitter: purplepopple
_______________________________________________
Education mailing list
Education(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/education
--
Tighe Flanagan
Arab World Education Program Manger
Wikimedia Foundation
_______________________________________________
Education mailing list
Education(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/education
--
Jami Mathewson
Program Manager
Wiki Education Foundation
jami(a)wikiedfoundation.org
User:Jami (Wiki Ed)
@WikiEducation
Our organization supports the Wikipedia Education Program in the United States and
Canada.
_______________________________________________
Education mailing list
Education(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/education