If you think of "education" as the provision of information, then yes, the
Internet is "replacing teachers". However, it is really not doing anything
different than books, video and audio; none of which has replaced teachers.
There is a social component to education, the interaction with those who have more
experience and yes, knowledge, that a computer cannot match. Even with a
memorization-heavy subject like history, you still need a teacher, if for nothing else, to
help sift through and analyze the mass of information and interpretations now available.
Remember, we went through similar predictions with videotaped lessons, before that,
televised lessons and even before that, correspondence courses. However, the completion
rate on these are dismal, because people need interaction and structure at the very
least.
Rather than thinking of technology as replacing teachers, it is radically challenging
teachers and educational institutions, not so much because that it is providing
information in a radically different way, but because information is now ubiquitous. If
teachers and schools dont exist simply to provide a set of information to learn, what
should we be doing? There is no clear answer, but from experience, I do know it will
require being a LOT more active and interactive than it used to be. If students are going
to plunk money down for formal education, those hours in the classroom need to count for a
lot more than they use to.
As for Wikipedia, I dont see the educational value in it so much as the technology, but
rather that it provides an opportunity for students to "apprentice" especially
from my point of view as a language teacher. Students are creating and modifying texts,
which are not simple exercises but the "real thing" with real consequences. And
not just texts, but other forms of media such as video and digital animation.... Wiki
Learning is doing a couple projects of this type as we speak now.
However, none of this indicates that working with Wikipedia means a purely online
environment. Perhaps just the opposite. Creating Wikipedia content is not drill-work,but
rather so-very human. With its mass of rules and norms, the involvement of someone who has
experience becomes more essential. This is why very few new editors stick around and why
the Education Program has the concept of Campus Ambassadors.
IMHO, technology is best used in these situations: to take drill work out of the
classroom, to take lecture out of the classroom (flipped classroom) and to allow students
to do activities that before were not possible before. Wikipedia fits in the last
category, because perhaps its greatest contribution to education is allowing students to
publish work for the world to see within a community that is outside campus.
Leigh
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 08:30:06 -0700
From: wiki.pine(a)gmail.com
To: education(a)lists.wikimedia.org; wikimedia-cascadia(a)lists.wikimedia.org;
wiki-research-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Subject: [Wikimedia Education] Wikipedia's role in Internet-based education
I'm interested in hearing experienced educators' and researchers' thoughts
about what roles Wikipedia, and Internet-based learning in general, can and can't do
well.
Articles for consideration:
http://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la-oe-0608-godsey-altschool-teachers-2…
http://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2015/06/04/technology-wont-…
What does Wikipedia education do well, and what doesn't it do well?
Is Wikipedia-based education amplifying the learning of students who are likely to be from
highly resourced schools?
Do we have evidence that Wikipedia based education has outcomes for students that are
similar to, or better than, other kinds of online learning?
How can we offer a service that is widely beneficial for students and teachers with
limited technological resources? Or should we not try because of the additional
challenges?
Thanks,
Pine
_______________________________________________
Education mailing list
Education(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/education