Hi,
> Hoi,
> If you assume that your tool is only to be used for GFDL content then fine,
> but what would you do if the license is a different one ?? You restrict the
> use of your tool if you assume GFDL. Given that it is not unlikely that
> everything in the WMF may go to the CC-by-sa, it is not that brilliant an
> idea anyway,
>
Gerard, thank you for the topic, we'll consider including other licenses
in one of the next releases.
Well, the license can probably be updated easily (even site-specific).
And we're still GFDL, mostly...
What would be neat (and neccessary at some point): Incorporate the
license information for each image used. Because /these/ can be
different than GFDL.
You might be able to use my Commons API for this in the near future:
http://toolserver.org/~magnus/commonsapi.php
provided the images are on Commons. For images on the wikipedias, just
include the image page.
Magnus, it's a good idea to incorporate license information for each
image. Thanks for giving opportunity to use your API.
Regards,
Robert