Just what is a "reasonable" level of quality?
on 7/7/08 1:38 PM, Thomas Dalton at thomas.dalton@gmail.com wrote:
That depends on the person and their purpose in looking up the information.
I don't understand this answer.
And, the quality of an end result is very much tied to how it got there.
Of course, but does a "non-cultist" approach actually produce better content than a "cultist" one? I suspect it's just a matter of making the writers happier, which isn't a bad thing, but doesn't actually help attract readers.
This one I understand quite well. It explains the present state, focus and direction of (at least) the English Wikipedia Project. And what is next, a push to attract advertisers?
Marc Riddell