On Sep 17, 2007, at 12:10 PM, Ian Tresman wrote:
Indeed! There is more to what has been forgotten than lack of notability.
It seems to me that you can demonstrate notability, but impossible to demonstrate non-notability.
In this case, we're not only borderline notable (strange, laughable, non-science nonsense "Theories" being published, as with Time Cube and Velikovsky), but we are getting three levels out... 1. obscure college self-published 'zine (which was then run by uhm, this guy: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Talbott ) -- 2. temporarily publishing a mini series -----3. on strange, laughable, non-science.
I'm in no real rush to see wikipedia populated with articles, about a fan-driven college 'zine, writing a little mini-series on some topic.
I don't care if the mini-series is about Britney Spears, Buffy, Navel lint, Time Cube, *whatever*.
The fact that this obscure 'zine's mini-series is specifically about somebody who earned his coin complaining that his totally unscientific ideas weren't treated like, well, (giggle) science, well.... that just adds to the irony.
-Ronabop