On 9/17/07, George Herbert george.herbert@gmail.com wrote:
On 9/17/07, Ian Tresman ian2@knowledge.co.uk wrote:
The credibility of Velikovsky's ideas have nothing to do with the Pensée series. And Velikovsky never described planetary "billiards".
My grandparents' library had some of his first editions. I'm using one of the modern euphamisms, but I'm intimately familiar with his work. It has no scientific credibility in the modern sense.
I think you mean "dysphemism" or more colloquially "brickbat" here, not "euphemism".
-- Jussi-Ville Heiskanen, ~ [[User:Cimon Avaro]]