On 9/17/07, George Herbert <george.herbert(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 9/17/07, Ian Tresman <ian2(a)knowledge.co.uk>
wrote:
The credibility of Velikovsky's ideas have
nothing to do with the Pensée series. And
Velikovsky never described planetary "billiards".
My grandparents' library had some of his first editions. I'm using
one of the modern euphamisms, but I'm intimately familiar with his
work. It has no scientific credibility in the modern sense.
I think you mean "dysphemism" or more colloquially "brickbat"
here, not "euphemism".
--
Jussi-Ville Heiskanen, ~ [[User:Cimon Avaro]]