I don't think it was inappropriate. That's
what matters here - what I
think, and what the list admins think.
Mark
On 09/03/07, Steve <subsume(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hmm, sure. I also think administrative skepticism
is > always <
neccessary, regardless of the tally of charges. Demonization is always
a very useful tool against people who have done something wrong, and
is a very effective marginalizer.
Your initial smarmy, condescending rant was totally inappropriate, and
I was glad that George Herbert followed it up with a measured
description of the problem.
-S
On 3/9/07, Mark Williamson <node.ue(a)gmail.com> wrote:
It becomes an issue when somebody espouses racism
in every post and
uses it to personally attack others. "You guys won't listen to me
because you must all be Koreans", for example.
Mark
On 08/03/07, Delirium <delirium(a)hackish.org> wrote:
Mark Williamson wrote:
> Because you are a racist :-) You probably even deny the indigenous
> status of the Ainu.
I would hope that's not the reason... if we were to block people for
holding objectionable opinions (even exceedingly objectionable ones), I
could submit a very long list of names of people to be blocked,
including many admins!
-Mark
_______________________________________________
Wikipedia-l mailing list
Wikipedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l
--
Refije dirije lanmè yo paske nou posede pwòp bato.
_______________________________________________
Wikipedia-l mailing list
Wikipedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l
_______________________________________________
Wikipedia-l mailing list
Wikipedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l
--
Refije dirije lanmè yo paske nou posede pwòp bato.
_______________________________________________
Wikipedia-l mailing list
Wikipedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org