David Monniaux wrote:
The Pokémon articles do not generate angry complaints. They are used to mock Wikipedia, but are not a major target for libel and other issues taking up precious resources.
I generally consider the school articles relatively more important than the Pokémon articles, though the writing on the latter appears more thorough. Still I would oppose deleting either. If the school articles contain libel and other sundry vandalism remove the libel and vandalism. Stop using that asd an excuse for removing material that you don't like.
Ec