David Goodman wrote:
An good article that is properly defended is less likely to be deleted. I have seen many worthy articles fail because there are no outside references, and the claims are either exorbitant or mild. You can not expect others to know, unless you tell them.
All good articles also need time to evolve. Stubs don't seem like much, but they are a beginning. References are a good thing; good references are even better. These too develop over time. References are more important when the facts are in dispute, but many articles can afford patience when dealing with references.
Ec