There has been a lot of blog buzz charting this as a possible competitor to Wikipedia. And at first it seemed quite real, and honestly, quite frightening to me. But if you read the post carefully, I don't think that ideas such as "For many topics, there will likely be competing knols on the same subject." and "...will include the opinions and points of view of the authors." sounds like a competition for a source of reliable information. To get reliable info, students and other people who are looking for "the first thing someone who searches for this topic for the first time will want to read" aren't going to want to read ten different articles on the Holocaust to get the full perspective. They need one, comprehensive unbiased source for an introduction.
On Dec 13, 2007 9:15 PM, cohesion cohesion@sleepyhead.org wrote:
"Earlier this week, we started inviting a selected group of people to try a new, free tool that we are calling "knol", which stands for a unit of knowledge. Our goal is to encourage people who know a particular subject to write an authoritative article about it. The tool is still in development and this is just the first phase of testing. For now, using it is by invitation only. But we wanted to share with everyone the basic premises and goals behind this project."
From google http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2007/12/encouraging-people-to-contribute.html
Just wondering what people think. :)
Judson http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Cohesion
Wikipedia-l mailing list Wikipedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l