Oh my God...
Define "intelligentsiya". I did not know we had "cultural level
codes"...
Listen you guys cannot one day come here and claim that "there are less differences
than between EN_US and EN_UK" and the other come here and tell us that it's a
tragedy because we censor you as a unique language.
It's either TWO languages or not. If yes:
- yours hasn't got an ISO code and shouldn't be hosted here
If no:
- the only thing that changed is minor things like "neighbor=neighbour" AND the
admin structure. That is, you lost your internal mafia and cry for that.
I can understand that power is often a matter in human societies, yet... what do you get
from being an admin in a wiki? Do you become popular? Do you have more sexual partners? Or
do you get money to allow this or that article to be published? I don't know...
Start from defining "intelligentsiya", I'm really curious.
Bèrto ‘d Sèra
Personagi dl’ann 2006 për l’arvista american-a Time (tanme tuti vojàotri)
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1569514,00.html
-----Original Message-----
From: wikipedia-l-bounces(a)lists.wikimedia.org
[mailto:wikipedia-l-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of Alexander Cajcyc
Sent: Sunday, April 29, 2007 1:35 PM
To: wikipedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Subject: Re: [Wikipedia-l] be: and be-x-old: interwiki
The 2005 paper bases on pre-reformed orthography used in emigrant communities and among
intelligentsiya. It sums it up and standartises it.
Soviet-orthography wikipedians refused to compromise, so there will be two Belarusian
wikipedias :(
-----Original Message-----
From: wikipedia-l-bounces(a)lists.wikimedia.org
[mailto:wikipedia-l-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org]On Behalf Of GerardM
Sent: Sunday, April 29, 2007 2:22 PM
To: wikipedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Subject: Re: [Wikipedia-l] be: and be-x-old: interwiki
Hoi,
The names you suggest are not what I would consider good proposals. Given
that this orthography is based on a paper in 2005 it hardly qualifies as
classic.
Thanks,
Gerard
On 4/29/07, Alexander Cajcyc <czalex(a)bk.ru> wrote:
By the way, when will the wikipedia prefix for Classical Belarusian
changed to something reasonable from the temporary "be-x-old"? A good
proposal was "be-classic", "be-class" or similar.
A.C.
-----Original Message-----
From: wikipedia-l-bounces(a)lists.wikimedia.org [mailto:
wikipedia-l-bounces(a)lists.wikimedia.org]On Behalf Of Ihar Hrachyshka
Sent: Saturday, April 28, 2007 10:56 PM
To: wikipedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Subject: Re: [Wikipedia-l] be: and be-x-old: interwiki
У Няд, 29/04/2007 у 09:08 +0200, Andre Engels піша:
Doing interwiki links to be-x-old: is now
possible; however, both
wikipedias now have "Беларуская" as the name for the language. I think
there should be an extra specification to distinguish the two, just
like nb: does not have 'Norsk' any more, but is called 'Norsk
(bokmål)'.
Does anyone who knows Belarus have good idea for the separate names?
My own guess does not get further than a translation of "Belarussian
(official)" for be:
be-x-old should be named like "Беларуская (тарашкевіца)"
_______________________________________________
Wikipedia-l mailing list
Wikipedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l
_______________________________________________
Wikipedia-l mailing list
Wikipedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l
_______________________________________________
Wikipedia-l mailing list
Wikipedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l
_______________________________________________
Wikipedia-l mailing list
Wikipedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l