Hoi, The names you suggest are not what I would consider good proposals. Given that this orthography is based on a paper in 2005 it hardly qualifies as classic. Thanks, Gerard
On 4/29/07, Alexander Cajcyc czalex@bk.ru wrote:
By the way, when will the wikipedia prefix for Classical Belarusian changed to something reasonable from the temporary "be-x-old"? A good proposal was "be-classic", "be-class" or similar.
A.C.
-----Original Message----- From: wikipedia-l-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org [mailto: wikipedia-l-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org]On Behalf Of Ihar Hrachyshka Sent: Saturday, April 28, 2007 10:56 PM To: wikipedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Subject: Re: [Wikipedia-l] be: and be-x-old: interwiki
У Няд, 29/04/2007 у 09:08 +0200, Andre Engels піша:
Doing interwiki links to be-x-old: is now possible; however, both wikipedias now have "Беларуская" as the name for the language. I think there should be an extra specification to distinguish the two, just like nb: does not have 'Norsk' any more, but is called 'Norsk (bokmål)'.
Does anyone who knows Belarus have good idea for the separate names? My own guess does not get further than a translation of "Belarussian (official)" for be:
be-x-old should be named like "Беларуская (тарашкевіца)"
Wikipedia-l mailing list Wikipedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l
Wikipedia-l mailing list Wikipedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l