The articles were nominated for speedy deletion because the nominator
thought they were not notable. Sadly, systemic bias influences the
nominator's judgement of notability. Articles on Singaporean topics
get nominated for deletion all the time.
2007/4/11, Frederick Noronha <fred(a)bytesforall.org>rg>:
Hi all,
I am a journalist in Goa, India and a contributor to the Wikipedia.
Among other things, my interest is in ICT4D (information and
communication technologies for development), and have written quite a
bit on the subject.
Recently, I find some entries which I initiated coming in for 'speedy
deletion', which is kind of discouraging. Take the example below, of a
South African group whose work I know, and certainly deserves a
Wikipedia entry.
http://72.14.253.104/search?q=cache:_LQK2Uo3l5AJ:en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unga…
Could I request a closer check before deleting entries, specially
deserving ones (which may require a few more details and inputs, but
surely not, in my view, deletion!)
Regards, FN
--
FN M: 0091 9822122436 P: +91-832-240-9490 (after 1300IST please)
http://fn.goa-india.org http://fredericknoronha.wordpress.com
Konkani Wikipedia (under incubation) needs your help!
http://incubator.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wp/kok
_______________________________________________
Wikipedia-l mailing list
Wikipedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l