Its accuracy is downsward sloping, typically. =)
-S
On 10/25/06, ScottL scott@mu.org wrote:
"Historical reference material" is going to go out of date?
SKL
David Goodman wrote:
They won't stay authoritative very long, unless we were to finance
further
editions as as well.
On 10/24/06, sigmaman sigmaman@gmail.com wrote:
Mr Wales wanted it, so I am going to give him mine...
For me, I see two main areas where the money could be spent:
1- Text books copyright buyouts. Primarily historical reference
material.
2- Commisioning original photographic and illustrative content for Wikipedia (under the SA or GFDL, of course).
Let's face, $100 million can buy a lot of stuff. Certain established
text
books being licensed under a SA license would do a world of good. _______________________________________________ Wikipedia-l mailing list Wikipedia-l@Wikimedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l
Wikipedia-l mailing list Wikipedia-l@Wikimedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l