Its accuracy is downsward sloping, typically. =)
-S
On 10/25/06, ScottL <scott(a)mu.org> wrote:
"Historical reference material" is going to go out of date?
SKL
David Goodman wrote:
They won't stay authoritative very long,
unless we were to finance
further
editions as as well.
On 10/24/06, sigmaman <sigmaman(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Mr Wales wanted it, so I am going to give him mine...
>
> For me, I see two main areas where the money could be spent:
>
> 1- Text books copyright buyouts. Primarily historical reference
material.
>
> 2- Commisioning original photographic and illustrative content for
> Wikipedia
> (under the SA or GFDL, of course).
>
> Let's face, $100 million can buy a lot of stuff. Certain established
text
books
being licensed under a SA license would do a world of good.
_______________________________________________
Wikipedia-l mailing list
Wikipedia-l(a)Wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l
_______________________________________________
Wikipedia-l mailing list
Wikipedia-l(a)Wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l