"Historical reference material" is going to go out of date?
SKL
David Goodman wrote:
They won't stay authoritative very long, unless we
were to finance further
editions as as well.
On 10/24/06, sigmaman <sigmaman(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Mr Wales wanted it, so I am going to give him
mine...
For me, I see two main areas where the money could be spent:
1- Text books copyright buyouts. Primarily historical reference material.
2- Commisioning original photographic and illustrative content for
Wikipedia
(under the SA or GFDL, of course).
Let's face, $100 million can buy a lot of stuff. Certain established text
books being licensed under a SA license would do a world of good.
_______________________________________________
Wikipedia-l mailing list
Wikipedia-l(a)Wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l