So? For example the entire concept of an article about the country of Macedonia angers many Greek people. Since when was the fact that someone could get angry about something an argument not to do something?
/Andreas
On 3/13/06, Mark Williamson node.ue@gmail.com wrote:
That's already been proposed, and it seems like a good idea.
The only troubling part of your proposal is that data could be stored in the database in Cyrillic, which I think might anger some Romanians.
Mark
On 12/03/06, Neil Harris usenet@tonal.clara.co.uk wrote:
Caroline Ford wrote:
There seems to be no way that Romanians will tolerate cyrillic language (even via a software setting) on their wikipedia.
Caroline/secretlondon
Okay, then.
Let the ro: and mo: Wikipedias be interfaces to the same underlying data, then but let the Wikipedia be a Cyrillic-free zone, both in terms of content and interface, and mo: Wikipedia be the same as ro:, only with interface and content optionally presented in Cyrillic, with two-way transliteration for editing, as per the Chinese and Serbian Wikipedias.
-- Neil
Wikipedia-l mailing list Wikipedia-l@Wikimedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l
-- "Take away their language, destroy their souls." -- Joseph Stalin _______________________________________________ Wikipedia-l mailing list Wikipedia-l@Wikimedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l