I'm only saying that it is not normal that we are left here to quarrel. Even in a free country, a court of law is not an anarchic exchange of oppinions. There is a judge that: 1. lets the 2 parties expose their POV 2. asks questions 3. decides
We have been left at stage 1, which is not normal, but lets me express my personal oppinion (argumented) that you only spread FUD.
Dpotop
Mark Williamson node.ue@gmail.com wrote: So it's not OK for me to accuse you of FUD, but it's OK for you to accuse me?
I have presented plenty of proof. I am done arguing with you here about this.
The decision makers have left, as I said. They are no longer listening.
Mark
On 29/06/06, Jacky PB wrote:
Hello everybody,
It's been now some time we are providing actual proof in support of a petition to close the Moldovan wikipedia.
However, it is obvious that something is wrong, because every single message of ours is simply buried under sequences of messages from Mark Williamson.
Moreover:
- Our messages are sequences of facts that can be verified by anybody. Proof, in the scientific sense.
- The edits of Mark have the sole goal of discreditating the opposed camp. No proof, just "their oppinion is biased, because they have a hidden agenda". The very definition of FUD.
Under these conditions, nobody says nothing! We are left here to exchange messages in an uncontrolled fashion, while the matter is really important.
Where are the decision makers? Isn't there nobody
Yours, [[:en:Dpotop]], [[:ro:Dpotop]]
Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ Wikipedia-l mailing list Wikipedia-l@Wikimedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l