No, not really.
This has little to do with spelling - even in the most recent times when English spelling was largely up to the individual author, they would've branded that as "incorrect".
People like you seem to believe that language does _not_ change over time.
In that case I say to you, behold:
"Ne sorga, snotor guma; selre bið æghwæm þæt he his freond wrece, þonne he fela murne. Ure æghwylc sceal ende gebidan worolde lifes; wyrce se þe mote domes ær deaþe; þæt bið drihtguman unlifgendum æfter selest."
That's a quote from what I consider to be one of the most splendid works of English poetry.
What, you say, English? Isn't that Icelandic or some other crazy langauge like that? No, it is indeed English, and that is how it was written. Even if you replaced the spelling of words that have cognates in modern English with their current standard spelling, it would be quite literally incomprehensible.
Many of the words have been replaced by French ones, many others have changed in their pronunciation so drastically as to be quite literally unrecognisable.
Mark
On 29/05/05, Chad Perrin perrin@apotheon.com wrote:
On Sat, May 28, 2005 at 07:28:01PM -0700, Mark Williamson wrote:
As I said before, even dirty perscriptivists (viz Perrin, C.) always come to accept language change _eventually_.
Otherwise, the text of your message would have read like something more along the lines of "Spec þ?? fore þin sylf!" (Stephen Forrest may correct me here in the case that ic may've spake me here in a wrong-like manner yar)
In point of fact, the examples of archaic speech you provide owe their obsolescence more to an imposition of standards than to a modification of language by accepting corruptions. The fact that there is only one "correct" spelling for "self" is, in fact, more a prescriptivist-friendly alteration of language than descriptivist. Semantic, syntactic, and even vocal standards have been adopted as "correct" over the years in addition to descriptive drift over the years. In any case, barring the development of an immortality treatment, I doubt I'll outlive a time when "reknowned" is considered technically incorrect by a substantial demographic.
-- Chad Perrin [ CCD CopyWrite | http://ccd.apotheon.org ]