Timwi wrote:
Alphax wrote:
Timwi wrote:
Denis Howe wrote:
I am very happy to have any kind of acknowledgement or back link on FOLDOC based articles in Wikipedia. I would be almost as happy just to have a single acknowledgement on some suitable global page. I would not be at all happy to have no acknowledgement at all but I'd just cry quietly to myself at night about it. :-)
/me idly envisions a [[Category:Articles based on FOLDOC]], but then keeps quiet for fear of the anti-Categories league.
[[Special:Whatlinkshere/Template:FOLDOC]]
Well, duh. That requires the presence of {{FOLDOC}} in the article. And it's not very useful because it also lists talk pages that just happen to link to it (as opposed to transcluding it).
Yeah, I know, my Category proposal also requires the presence of [[Category:Articles based on FOLDOC]], but at least it wouldn't generate such a big box that would need to be carried around with the article forever.
How about a FOLDOC article listing all it's entries and articles based on them?
And since when is {{FOLDOC}} big?