Timwi wrote:
Alphax wrote:
Timwi wrote:
Denis Howe wrote:
I am very happy to have any kind of
acknowledgement or back link on
FOLDOC based
articles in Wikipedia. I would be almost as happy just to have a
single
acknowledgement on some suitable global page. I would not be at
all happy to
have no acknowledgement at all but I'd just cry quietly to myself
at night about
it. :-)
/me idly envisions a [[Category:Articles based on FOLDOC]], but then
keeps quiet for fear of the anti-Categories league.
[[Special:Whatlinkshere/Template:FOLDOC]]
Well, duh. That requires the presence of {{FOLDOC}} in the article.
And it's not very useful because it also lists talk pages that just
happen to link to it (as opposed to transcluding it).
Yeah, I know, my Category proposal also requires the presence of
[[Category:Articles based on FOLDOC]], but at least it wouldn't
generate such a big box that would need to be carried around with the
article forever.
How about a FOLDOC article listing all it's entries and articles based
on them?
And since when is {{FOLDOC}} big?
--
Alphax
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Alphax
There are two kinds of people: those who say to God, 'Thy will be done,' and those
to whom God says, 'All right, then, have it your way.' - C. S. Lewis