I'm pretty sure it is. The legal question here though is, as I
understand it, whether or not copyrights of languages are valid or
not, and apparently there is precident (Lojban) for languages being
uncopyrightable.
--node
On Tue, 21 Sep 2004 23:59:17 -0400, James R. Johnson
<modean52(a)comcast.net> wrote:
Isn't Klingon copyrighted?
James
-----Original Message-----
From: wikipedia-l-bounces(a)Wikimedia.org
[mailto:wikipedia-l-bounces@Wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of Stirling Newberry
Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2004 11:58 PM
To: Mark Williamson; wikipedia-l(a)Wikimedia.org
Subject: Re: [Wikipedia-l] toki pona
On Sep 21, 2004, at 11:53 PM, Mark Williamson wrote:
As I said before, while the law may be debated I
added the notices
because of a suspected copyvio. IANAL...
--node
This point is not debateable - a language is not copyrightable, since
it is an idea, not a particular work.
_______________________________________________
Wikipedia-l mailing list
Wikipedia-l(a)Wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l
_______________________________________________
Wikipedia-l mailing list
Wikipedia-l(a)Wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l