Sj wrote:
Yes; I like Erik's idea of doing this once a sizeable number of articles (1000?) have passed through this system in at least one language. At the same time, we should commission a similar content comparison for en:...
What I'd *really* like is details on the quality review de: apparently went through to get de: to such a state, and whether we can just do that for en: as well. On the principle that we undeniably have lots of good stuff, but hitting 'Random page' twenty times shows up our defects glaringly.
- d.