Erik Moeller wrote:
However, given that all notable arguments have already been exchanged, I think the best way to go about this is to simply start a vote on Meta on whether we want a Klingon Wikipedia. I suggest you do it.
There was never a vote on Meta on whether to start a Wikipedia in German, Polish, Swedish or Norwegian. They were just started, and then it turned out that they attracted volunteers. I fail to see the harm in starting a Klingon Wikipedia. If it fails to attract volunteers, it is no worse than a Wikipedia in Latvian (96 articles) or Volapuk (44 articles) that also fail to attract volunteers. Nobody says Wikipedia as a whole is a fiasco because it has a Lativan "encyclopedia" that only contains 96 articles. (For comparison, the Kashubian Wikipedia started on April 1st already has 130 articles, apparently written by 3 volunteers.) On the other hand, if the Klingon Wikipedia does attract volunteers, it can develop into a unique resource for people who are interested in that language, just like the Esperanto Wikipedia has become.
In this case I don't want a vote, so I guess I'm "not a democrat", right?