Tim Starling wrote:
A quick google search seems to imply that "Modern Egyptian" is not exactly a conlang. Rather, it seems to be a transliteration of Coptic to the latin alphabet. This is all based on the only relevant google hit for "modern egyptian language", so "Prince of Egypt" should feel free to enlighten us if this is incorrect.
Coptic has a perfectly good ISO 639 language code, 'cop', and is in no way at all "a new conlang".
-- brion vibber (brion @ pobox.com)