Tim Starling wrote:
A quick google search seems to imply that "Modern
Egyptian" is not
exactly a conlang. Rather, it seems to be a transliteration of Coptic to
the latin alphabet. This is all based on the only relevant google hit
for "modern egyptian language", so "Prince of Egypt" should feel free
to
enlighten us if this is incorrect.
Coptic has a perfectly good ISO 639 language code, 'cop', and is in no
way at all "a new conlang".
-- brion vibber (brion @
pobox.com)