Sean Barrett wrote:
Not sure what's *horrible* about no derivative works. Wikipedia doesn't need to alter most images. I'd take cc-nd over copyrighted with fair use. If cc-nd is completely unacceptable, then so is fair use, right?
The GFDL states that third-generation copiers can alter the work, so long as they maintain its history. If you say that about work you only have cc-nd or fair use rights to, you're in violation.
Not according to Jimbo, you're not.
Anthony