Ian Mackinnon wrote:
I strongly request that the Traditional Chinese version of Wikipedia be given it's own language space...
A real good argument I can give for this is why does wikipedia have simple.wikipedia.org for "Simple English" instead of it being lumped into en.wikipedia.org?
I don't feel this is a strong argument for splitting Traditional and Simplified Chinese. The Simple English Wikipedia has only attracted 1500 articles so far. I expect it may have been far more successful had it been better merged with the English Wikipedia at the beginning.
Angela.