Erik Moeller wrote:
What I said is:
"Tim Starling disabled the wiki on my request because it was not created in consensus. However, should the wiki be reinstated without due process, I will if necessary take it down myself."
Note the important words "without due process" and "if necessary" (interestingly, you also added an exclamation mark where there was none). You seem to be happy only if a developer does what you want, regardless of whether there is community consensus to do so.
I would love to see your evidence for there being "community consensus" to take down the Klingon Wikipedia.
Of course, my support for this compromise wanes the more you use phrases like "conceited and respectless", [...]
I'm really really sorry about that one. I regretted having written that after I sent it. I got totally out of control there. I know this isn't a good excuse, but I want to apologise nevertheless.
I just can't describe how angry I was and still am about the favouritism Toki Pona is receiving. It is totally infuriating, seriously.
I don't think I have (or at least I never meant to) campaigned for removing Toki Pona inter-wiki links; I would prefer to allow Klingon ones. But if disallowing Klingon inter-wiki links is the only way to allow a dedicated community of people to contribute to a well-meant project in the Klingon language, then Toki Pona shouldn't have them either.
Timwi