Tomasz Wegrzanowski <taw(a)users.sf.net> writes:
Accepting money from someone isn't a neutral act.
Who gives a monkeys?
The point of view of the Encyclopedia has to be neutral,
everything else is negotiable. If we let amazon make editorial policy, thats
stupid, otherwise lets try and show Jimbo some latitude as he throws
increasingly large amounts of *his* *own* *money* at wikipedia
(which you seem happy to accept).
Money does stink
Now who's being non-neutral. Does money spent on AIDS research stink?
Does BOMIS spent on wikipedia servers stink too? Which stinks worse?
Idiocies like this make me embarassed to be a liberal.
--
Gareth Owen
"And Cunct, please stop being such a prick."
-- wikipedia-l gains a new mantra (Wed Nov 6 2002)