On Thu, Aug 26, 2004 at 11:46:32AM +0200, Peter Gervai wrote:
On Thu, Aug 26, 2004 at 10:06:56AM +0800, Andrew Lih wrote:
I hesitate to even post this, because it's virtual flame-bait. :) But with all the accolades Wikipedia receives in the press, you have to take the knocks too.
Why, this article is pretty fair. It states only the truth:
- Wikipedia is not reviewed by the academics
- Wikipedia does not guarantee validity or accuracy
Neither are paper encyclopedias, but somehow he didn't have any problems with them. This article is pure biased bullshit.