=20
Oui !
The french wikipedia has become a hunt place for
commas !
Even in articles less than 10 words long...
=20
Ouhl=E0l=E0... Warning commas-hunters ! Anthere is back
!!!
Ah, Tim ! Si tu n'existais pas, il faudrait t'inventer
!
Tiens, d'ailleurs, faudra que tu nous explique comment
on te reconnait, car franchement, connaitre ta cl=E9, =E7a
ne m'avance pas du tout du tout du tout
Télécharges la clé, que tu importes
dans PGP/GnuPG. Ensuite, avec
GnuPG/PGP, tu vérifies la signature du message. Le principe est que seul
le possesseur de la clé secrète correspondant à la clé publique peut
générer une signature correcte du message. C'est compris ?
Et tant que je ne comprend pas,
Tim , c'est Tim,
et Tim, c'est toi
Erreur, Anthere, erreur !
Sais-tu (oui, tu devrais avoir) qu'il y a près d'une dizaine de Tim sur
Wikipedia ? Il y aussi Athyrance, Athrystant, Athypique, etc...
Aussi, j'espère que tu ne te refuseras pas à comprendre...
Anthere, take
a look at [[SHA-1]] and tell me how
many commas are there?
There is only one, and it is not needed, from a
stylistic point of view.
This article is a very good example : Some articles
may not have commas,
unless they are long and complete enough to be
considerated as articles.
I never said the comma technic was the right one to
count an article as a "good" article
Your example is an extrem case. I see no pb with you
adding a comma here.
But all the articles you did this morning, with commas
in comments are much poorer than SHA-1, and imho
hardly deserve the name of encyclopedic articles.
Dictionary articles yes, but not encyclopedia
articles.
Dictionary, encyclopedia articles... That's another problem.
I think that the being who did this just cannot understand French... ;->
=20
That's why I have added commas to every
article
which doesn't have
one... C'est aussi simple que =E7a.
=20
Why not a mix between the comma method, and a
certain
number of words ? (at least people will know how
to
count ;-))
=20
Greater-than-zero-size check is simple and efficient
enough...
It is simple. But it is slightly ridiculous. Certainly
not the best way to convince newcomers we are a great
resource
Encore une histoire "d'image de marque", Anthere... Encore un différend
entre nous à ce sujet.
By the way, I am happy that Tim took some time to
improve some of Tim articles. Have you seen ?
http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Banane
Tim is *very* nice ! But who are you talking about ? Athymik, Athyrance, Atrhystant,
Athypique, Athyrail ?
Athymik
(athymik(a)ifrance.com)
Cl=E9 publique
http://athymik.devveb.org/public_key.asc
Attention, cl=E9 publique, nous avons affaire =E0 un Tim
certifi=E9 !
Ant
__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - forms, calculators, tips, more
http://taxes.yahoo.com/ Dis Anthere, tu nous fais un petit sondage là ?
Yahoons-nous ?
Et si on répond, est-ce qu'on a droit au "Tax Center" en plus ?
--
Athymik (athymik(a)ifrance.com)
Clé publique
http://athymik.devveb.org/public_key.asc