=20
Oui ! The french wikipedia has become a hunt place for commas ! Even in articles less than 10 words long...
=20 Ouhl=E0l=E0... Warning commas-hunters ! Anthere is back !!!
Ah, Tim ! Si tu n'existais pas, il faudrait t'inventer !
Tiens, d'ailleurs, faudra que tu nous explique comment on te reconnait, car franchement, connaitre ta cl=E9, =E7a ne m'avance pas du tout du tout du tout
Télécharges la clé, que tu importes dans PGP/GnuPG. Ensuite, avec GnuPG/PGP, tu vérifies la signature du message. Le principe est que seul le possesseur de la clé secrète correspondant à la clé publique peut générer une signature correcte du message. C'est compris ?
Et tant que je ne comprend pas, Tim , c'est Tim, et Tim, c'est toi
Erreur, Anthere, erreur ! Sais-tu (oui, tu devrais avoir) qu'il y a près d'une dizaine de Tim sur Wikipedia ? Il y aussi Athyrance, Athrystant, Athypique, etc... Aussi, j'espère que tu ne te refuseras pas à comprendre...
Anthere, take a look at [[SHA-1]] and tell me how many commas are there? There is only one, and it is not needed, from a stylistic point of view. This article is a very good example : Some articles may not have commas, unless they are long and complete enough to be considerated as articles.
I never said the comma technic was the right one to count an article as a "good" article Your example is an extrem case. I see no pb with you adding a comma here.
But all the articles you did this morning, with commas in comments are much poorer than SHA-1, and imho hardly deserve the name of encyclopedic articles. Dictionary articles yes, but not encyclopedia articles.
Dictionary, encyclopedia articles... That's another problem.
This is a dictionary article, with commas in comment :
http://fr.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtml?title=3DAiguchi&diff=3D0&oldid=... 43
I think that the being who did this just cannot understand French... ;->
=20
That's why I have added commas to every article which doesn't have one... C'est aussi simple que =E7a. =20
Why not a mix between the comma method, and a
certain
number of words ? (at least people will know how
to
count ;-))
=20 Greater-than-zero-size check is simple and efficient enough...
It is simple. But it is slightly ridiculous. Certainly not the best way to convince newcomers we are a great resource
Encore une histoire "d'image de marque", Anthere... Encore un différend entre nous à ce sujet.
By the way, I am happy that Tim took some time to improve some of Tim articles. Have you seen ?
Tim is *very* nice ! But who are you talking about ? Athymik, Athyrance, Atrhystant, Athypique, Athyrail ?
Athymik (athymik@ifrance.com) Cl=E9 publique http://athymik.devveb.org/public_key.asc
Attention, cl=E9 publique, nous avons affaire =E0 un Tim certifi=E9 !
Ant
Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Tax Center - forms, calculators, tips, more http://taxes.yahoo.com/
Dis Anthere, tu nous fais un petit sondage là ? Yahoons-nous ? Et si on répond, est-ce qu'on a droit au "Tax Center" en plus ?