It is a policy issue when I try to do something, I
explain *why* I do it on Brion page, and in the
comment box,
Why am I supposed to be reading Brion's talk page to figure out what you were
doing on a completely different page? That is silly.
.....
What I did (but left unfinished for it took me quite
some time just to do that, and even adding something
on the talk page would have taken about 10 mn to avoid
getting things messed) was utterly discarded and
labelled destruction by you, and is now unrecoverable.
? I did a backwards merge - it took me 7 minutes. However, when I first saw
your changes along with destruction your browser caused, I didn't have 5
minutes or the urge to fix the mess your browser caused AND recreate your
edits. Why should I be responsible for that anyway?
I consider having many different propositions done on
the same page is useless, they could be on separate
pages. That whole page is a total mess, and it is very
hard to see the different arguments. All the arguments
are not even there. Nobody is doing the job. I tried
to start it. And it was dismissed as inopportune.
Without consideration.
When edits are reverted without consideration, that's
a policy issue.
I considered your changes - and I disagreed with them. Especially the part
where your browser /destroyed/ the page. Hence this is a technical issue.
--mav
WikiKarma
I updated all the year pages and most of the other pages liked from
http://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/January_17