Could some of you perhaps try to reason with DW (who may also be 209.202.xxx.xxx) As far as I can tell (unless it's a major coincidence), he's brought in his friends Olivier and Suzanne to help ram through a bunch of French articles. Mast are pretty good, but both Zoe and I have asked that they try to stick to the format we've used for historical biography, with no response. I think a couple of others have also put comments for him and also have been ignored. There have also been questions about sources and images -- no response. It wouldn't matter if the articles were all neutral, but DW tends to put in phrases like "he had the morals of a tomcat" -- it's bad writing and without some kind of citation, it isn't appropriate (and I'd still re-write it).
I've tried to talk to this person, but he refuses to talk to me because he thinks I'm a German revisionist -- his last shot to me was to demand my credentials after implying that I had made them up. I provided them and asked for his -- no response.
I'll stop whining here, but I thought we were a community -- this guy seems to be a loose cannon with no respect for anybody else.
A tired Jules, who knows it's not her job to oversee all of history, but is apparently addicted.
A google search for "artistic temperament of a Renaissance prince and the morals of a tomcat" gets no hits, so if it copied might not be from the internet.
Good phrase to remember for the Mick Jagger article...
Fred