--- Jimmy Wales jwales@bomis.com wrote:
Daniel Mayer wrote:
- State that we have no intention of ever removing
es.wikipedia.com > > but we could point that URL to the Seville server is they wish to
stay on that server.
I don't think this is acceptable. Without sever unity, there is no way for us to enforce openness. If they start to ban people for political reasons, forming a 'cabal', we would be powerless to stop them.
In other words: we want them back on our US server, so that we, and not they, are in control. We know who should be banned, but we don't trust them with such decisions. Maybe we should say that clearly at the beginning; it will shorten the discussion considerably.
Axel
__________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? New DSL Internet Access from SBC & Yahoo! http://sbc.yahoo.com