On Wed, 2002-11-20 at 22:57, Toby Bartels wrote:
Christopher Mahan wrote:
By definition, if it includes all human knowledge, it will be NPOV, and if it does not, it will be POV.
This is not what the neutral point of view is.
In fact, anything that includes *all* of human knowledge must be POV.
Yup. I would much rather the official Wikipedia definition of neutral point of view actually gibe with the meaning of "neutral point of view" (see [[m:NPOV is an ideal]]) than the convoluted redefinition that stands now.
In other words, I'm with Mr. Mahan here.