Christopher Mahan wrote:
By definition, if it includes all human knowledge, it will be NPOV, and if it does not, it will be POV.
This is not what the neutral point of view is.
In fact, anything that includes *all* of human knowledge must be POV. For example, I believe that George W. Bush is an awful US President, my belief is justified, and it is correct (as it so happens ^_^). Therefore, I *know* that George W. Bush is an awful US President. But it wouldn't be NPOV of me to state this in a Wikipedia article (although I might attribute the opinion to certain people, explaining their reasons for their belief and presenting rebuttals from Bush's supporters). Thus Wikipedia will always lack that bit of human knowledge.
See [[en:Wikipedia:Neutral point of view]] for more.
-- Toby