On Wed, 12 Jun 2002, The Cunctator wrote:
I'd be skeptical about this metric being
equivalent to quality,
I think nobody has an easy answer to the definition of quality.
Traditional (non-editable) websites like Amazon's let visitors rank the
contents (was this book good? was this review useful?). Wikipedia lets
readers rewrite the articles they don't like. The very idea of "ranking"
the contents becomes obsolete.
--
Lars Aronsson (lars(a)aronsson.se)
tel +46-70-7891609
http://aronsson.se/ http://elektrosmog.nu/ http://susning.nu/