Last I heard, we solicited a report from Manning Bartlett on metadata, how
to keep track of it, why we should keep track of it, and so forth.
The suggestion is old, but basically, we shouldn't do it at all unless we
can do it right (and, above all, unless we can keep it *simple for
users*).
Automatically-generated metadata is a Good Thing, I think.
Larry
On Sun, 13 Jan 2002, Magnus Manske wrote:
I have a meta keywords tag automatically generated
from the links in the
article body. Check the output of any article at
http://wikipedia.sourceforge.net/fpw/wiki.phtml
Language will be done as well soon.
Magnus
-----Original Message-----
From: wikipedia-l-admin(a)nupedia.com
[mailto:wikipedia-l-admin@nupedia.com]On Behalf Of Kurt Jansson
Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2002 8:22 PM
To: wikipedia-l(a)nupedia.com
Subject: Re: [Wikipedia-l] Re: Incorrect HTML encoding--something new?
Hello everyone!
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//IETF//DTD
HTML//EN">
<HTML><HEAD><TITLE>Wikipedia: HomePage</TITLE>
</HEAD><BODY BGCOLOR="white">
Silly question from me:
Why don't we have meta tags like keywords, language, author <g>, etc.?
Bye,
Kurt
[Wikipedia-l]
To manage your subscription to this list, please go here:
http://www.nupedia.com/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l
[Wikipedia-l]
To manage your subscription to this list, please go here:
http://www.nupedia.com/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l