On Fri, 22 Feb 2002, Magnus Manske wrote:
But:
- There's a good, extensive article in the 'pedia
- Some troll deletes it (leaving the history intact)
- To everyone, it seems that there is no article
- Someone writes a two-line stub, not realizing that there's a much better
article in the history This would not be good, right?
The only difference between this and the current situation is what, *exactly*?
I was thinking about the "page titles to be deleted" list, and some of the empty or silly orphans. No need to accumulate that stuff in the database.
So, yes--retain the ability to permanently delete pages.
Larry