'Kate Hudson' has no content. The previous
version of it says 'hubba
hubba hubba', and the history says it was deleted and restored by
request. That is NOT an article. That is not even a pretense at an
article. That is a piece of stupidity that deserves oblivion. Why on
EARTH did someone request that that should be put back?
Gibberish is not an article. Blank pages are not an article. And
nonsense phrases posted by a casual passerby are not an article. They
just take up space that a real article could use. If it was a real
article it would say something like 'Kate Hudson is (blah blah blah)'.
Leaving this doesn't encourage the writer to make real contributions -
if anything it encourages them to leave more nonsense to clutter up the
space!
Someone got angry with me because I deleted subjects that could become
articles. So I resurrected them. Now people get angry at me because I did
that. So, what should I do then? It seems that the only way not to do
something wrong is to do nothing at all.
Please, either have a SINGLE set of rules that at least has no rules that
are conflicting, or have no rules at all. This is making me angry and sick
(literally).
Andre Engels