Thomas Hofer wrote:
There's a point that I don't understand:
Wikipedia has no records about
copyright-holders in its diffs and changelogs. When I create or edit a
page, the corporation that runs Wikipedia is the copyright-holder of
all my changes - which minimizes copyright-troubles. (And gives the
corporation the right to release modified or unmodified content under
any other license if they want).
If this is true, I find it quite worrying - I have put material on Wikipedia
that I have also published elsewhere. Does this mean that it can be claimed
this other publishing goes against Wikipedia's copyright?
As far as I know, I have not signed away my copyright on the material I
submit to Wikipedia. In my opinion, this means that I still hold the
copyright of the pieces I have written, although the corporation is the
copyright-holder of the site as a whole. I have not given up copyright,
I just restricted my rights as the copyright holder by:
1. Putting the material under a Free Documentation License
2. Allowing any type of publishing and changing that one could reasonably
expect be done to a Wikipedia entry
--
Andre Engels, engels(a)win.tue.nl
Telephone: +31(0)6-11181398 (GSM)
http://www.win.tue.nl/~engels/index_en.html
PGP Public key: see
http://www.win.tue.nl/~engels/pgp.asc
If we don't believe in freedom of expression for people we despise,
we don't believe in it at all -- Noam Chomsky