Hoi, Wikipedia is not my thing. I hardly ever write on articles. The article states that Rosie wrote 1000 articles.. Hardly an argument why she became a Wikipedian of the year.
The other aspect I give attention to is that we are REALLY bad at doing a good job for our own. There is a lot that is uncontroversial that can be added. It it the least that can be done to indicate why she is a Wikipedian of the year. Thanks, GerardM
On 30 June 2016 at 12:05, Erik Zachte ezachte@wikimedia.org wrote:
Gerard, feel free to follow-up on your call to action with more action.
Erik Zachte
-----Original Message----- From: Wikimedia-l [mailto:wikimedia-l-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of Gerard Meijssen Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2016 11:38 To: Wikimedia Mailing List Subject: [Wikimedia-l] Rosie Stephenson-Goodknight
Hoi,
At Wikimania two wikipedians of the year were elected. The article for one of them and the data at Wikidata are pathetic.
The article is a one liner stub. The Wikidata item had no statements and I added the few that were minimally needed.
I find it incredible that we take no care of our own even when they are obviously notable. Thanks, GerardM
PS I have not looked at any of the others and I would welcome it when they get some proper attention.
http://ultimategerardm.blogspot.nl/2016/06/wikipedia-wikipedian-of-year-rosi... _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe