Hoi,
Wikipedia is not my thing. I hardly ever write on articles. The article
states that Rosie wrote 1000 articles.. Hardly an argument why she became a
Wikipedian of the year.
The other aspect I give attention to is that we are REALLY bad at doing a
good job for our own. There is a lot that is uncontroversial that can be
added. It it the least that can be done to indicate why she is a Wikipedian
of the year.
Thanks,
GerardM
On 30 June 2016 at 12:05, Erik Zachte <ezachte(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
Gerard, feel free to follow-up on your call to action
with more action.
Erik Zachte
-----Original Message-----
From: Wikimedia-l [mailto:wikimedia-l-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org] On
Behalf Of Gerard Meijssen
Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2016 11:38
To: Wikimedia Mailing List
Subject: [Wikimedia-l] Rosie Stephenson-Goodknight
Hoi,
At Wikimania two wikipedians of the year were elected. The article for one
of them and the data at Wikidata are pathetic.
The article is a one liner stub. The Wikidata item had no statements and I
added the few that were minimally needed.
I find it incredible that we take no care of our own even when they are
obviously notable.
Thanks,
GerardM
PS I have not looked at any of the others and I would welcome it when they
get some proper attention.
http://ultimategerardm.blogspot.nl/2016/06/wikipedia-wikipedian-of-year-ros…
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
New messages to: Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
New messages to: Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>