I participated in organizing some competitions "scaled" (or level
organizated) ,much more modest but with the same purpose:increase the
interest and participation.
In these contests is often used the formula to select finalist works by
the "local" jury and, of course, the local winners. The local
organization then sends all the finalists works (awarded or not) at
"general" competitionand the "general" jury will select the winners
among all the "local" finalists. This presents advantages in terms of
participants: If your work is finalist it colud be awared localy or
general, or both, or none.
The photography is an art and therefore has a touch of subjectivity that
is given by the people of the jury. Is normal in such competitions That
win a work that has not been awarded locally.
Mafoso
Al 06/04/2011 10:50, En/na Béria Lima ha escrit:
And there are other way to see: If a image don't
win the local
competition, they could still be motivate to be the European winner. A
1st place can't be mad to not win twice, and a 2nd place would became
really happy if he win ;)
_____
/Béria Lima/
Wikimedia Portugal <http://wikimedia.pt>
(351) 963 953 042
/Imagine um mundo onde é dada a qualquer pessoa a possibilidade de ter
livre acesso ao somatório de todo o conhecimento humano. É isso o que
estamos a fazer./
2011/4/6 Susana Morais <susana.morais(a)wikimedia.pt
<mailto:susana.morais@wikimedia.pt>>
I think that case would not be so problematic, in my opinion (the
1st place is the "real" winner). But like you say, the criteria
used can be different, and if we make that clear from the
beginning, in the rules, etc., people will have to accept that
there would be, in fact, 2 different competitions, with different
results.
Susana
2011/4/6 Lodewijk <lodewijk(a)effeietsanders.org
<mailto:lodewijk@effeietsanders.org>>
Would the third ending up higher than the second be a problem
too, then?
(to be clear: I wouldn't have a problem with either situation,
since like Nuno says, there are many factors. Even the exact
criteria used by the jury will differ on European level
compared to for example the Portuguese jury).
Lodewijk
2011/4/6 Susana Morais <susana.morais(a)wikimedia.pt
<mailto:susana.morais@wikimedia.pt>>
The 2nd of a country ending up higher than the 1st in the
European Competition is in fact a problem. Maybe there
could be 2 different groups. Maybe the european jury could
decide between the 1st ones from each country (resulting
in a overall winner - for each category), and they could
also decide between the rest (2nd and 5th place in each
category, for example).
Susana
2011/4/6 Raul Kern <raunator(a)gmail.com
<mailto:raunator@gmail.com>>
Hoi.
Is there a "Topics/Agenda" wiki page for the May workshop?
--
Raul Kern
2011/4/5 Lodewijk <lodewijk(a)effeietsanders.org
<mailto:lodewijk@effeietsanders.org>>:
In any case, I think this is a perfect topic to
decide on in the May
workshop, so lets keep that as a deadline, but
discussions are of course
welcome here.
Best, Lodewijk
_______________________________________________
Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list
WikiLovesMonuments(a)lists.wikimedia.org
<mailto:WikiLovesMonuments@lists.wikimedia.org>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments
http://www.wikilovesmonuments.eu
_______________________________________________
Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list
WikiLovesMonuments(a)lists.wikimedia.org
<mailto:WikiLovesMonuments@lists.wikimedia.org>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments
http://www.wikilovesmonuments.eu
_______________________________________________
Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list
WikiLovesMonuments(a)lists.wikimedia.org
<mailto:WikiLovesMonuments@lists.wikimedia.org>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments
http://www.wikilovesmonuments.eu
_______________________________________________
Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list
WikiLovesMonuments(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments
http://www.wikilovesmonuments.eu