I agree with Valerio, don't hesitate to keep this discussion on-list. It is
interesting and can be helpful to others.
From a French Wiktionary contributor.
Jean-Philippe Béland
User:Amqui
On Sat, Mar 9, 2019 at 10:58 AM Reem Al-Kashif <reemalkashif(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Hello!
@Noe thank you! Take your time :) Ideally, I think I would like each
student to spend 5 hours on the project. This could change in group
projects scheme.
@Dennis Thank you! I have been an editor on Wikipedia since 2012 but never
really edited Wikitionary, as far as I remember. So, the info you provided
is really useful in designing a project task. The students native language
is Arabic and they are majoring in translation between Arabic and English.
I asked the students before about Wikitionary, and they seem to have come
across it before but they don't know much about it.
@Valerio Thank you! Glad you find the discussion useful.
Best,
Reem
On Sat, 9 Mar 2019 at 17:06, Valerio Barbaking <wiki.barbaking(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Hi, I personally find this discussion pretty
interesting, and I think
that
you can continue on-list, if you want... I don’t
think I’m the only one
who
can find some useful points in what you are
saying :)
Also, thanks to Noé for the slides, I will use them if I ever need
something similar for courses/presentations.
Have a nice day,
Valerio Barbaking (from the italian wiktionary)
Il giorno sab 9 mar 2019 alle 14:34 Dennis During <dcduring(a)gmail.com>
ha
scritto:
> The desirability of new entries varies according to which language
> Wiktionar(y/ies) will host the efforts, which language the entries will
> be in and which language is the native language of the students.
>
> Specifically, for English language words on English Wiktionary,
coverage
> is high. There are still many new words to
be added, but to reward
> students for new entries may create pressure to add obscure words with
> marginal attestation. On the other hand, entry quality is very uneven.
> Comparing to the OED or the "unabridged" print dictionaries, some
> entries seem to be too many definitions, some too few. Definitions may
> use words that themselves are dated, archaic, obsolete, or in an
> inappropriate registers. The layout of entries is fairly consistent,
> but is regularly criticized. At English Wiktionary, we have almost no
> knowledge about who our actual users are and how they use Wiktionary.
> The initial impressions of articulate users would be valuable to
regular
contributors to Wiktionary.
I would be happy to discuss this further. Off-list would probably be
more appropriate than on-list.
On 3/9/2019 6:23 AM, Reem Al-Kashif wrote:
> Hello!
>
> Hope this finds you well. I am teaching Lexicography to junior
university
> > students this semester. What are ways I can incorporate Wikitionary
in
the
> syllabus?
>
> The idea I have now is to make them complete a project on Wikitionary
by
> > adding entries to it. I think it would be awesome for them to see
their
project alive and not buried in heaps of paper in my
drawers.
Your input is highly appreciated.
Best,
Reem
_______________________________________________
Wiktionary-l mailing list
Wiktionary-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiktionary-l
--
Valerio Barbaking Iannucci
Coordinatore area didattica - Lazio
Mob: +39 340 3459046 <+39%20340%20345%209046> | Skype:
Valerio.iannucci84
Wikimedia Italia
_______________________________________________
Wiktionary-l mailing list
Wiktionary-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiktionary-l
--
*Kind regards,Reem Al-Kashif*
_______________________________________________
Wiktionary-l mailing list
Wiktionary-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiktionary-l