Hoi, By insisting on having flac you add a complication that does not add any value. Why would you use FLAC when the reason for having it in the first place is that people use the wav file in their applications. Thanks, GerardM
On 2/11/07, Erik Moeller erik@wikimedia.org wrote:
On 2/11/07, Gerard Meijssen gerard.meijssen@gmail.com wrote:
Gregory's proposal to use Ogg/FLAC is not helpfull. This is not the format that is used to analyse pronunciation files.
Looking at Wikipedia, there don't seem to be any patent issues with WAV. However, the format is typically used without compression, wheres Ogg FLAC would be lossless compression. Conversion between the two is trivial for anyone who works with audio, so in light of the fact that we're talking about thousands of pronunciation files, it seems reasonable to give preference to FLAC.
-- Peace & Love, Erik
DISCLAIMER: This message does not represent an official position of the Wikimedia Foundation or its Board of Trustees.
Wiktionary-l mailing list Wiktionary-l@lists.wikimedia.org http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiktionary-l