On Mon, 15 Nov 2004 13:14:27 +0100, Tomasz Sienicki tsca@edb.dk wrote:
The problem is that
- the original logo is English-centric and difficult to make local (translate)
- it's a nice design, but not really a logo, it does not contain a recognisable sign (that is clear among others on main pages of several projects where miniatures of 'sister projects' logos are shown)
Agreed.
That's why we've come up with an alternative logo (containing a sign, easy to translate). You can see it here: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Tsca_wiktionary_logo2.png
Now, the questions are:
- should we launch an inter-Wiktionary debate on a new logo?
or
- do we allow some Wiktionaries to use an alternative logo?
The former. It would be good to have a graphic in the logo along with the translatable title, just like the other wikimedia wikis.
*Muke!