On 2012-05-24 18:33, Sebastian Hellmann wrote:
I firmly believe that it would be a set back to a lot of people, if we started to divide the communities again.
I don't want to divide the community. The problem I see is people look at DBpedia's RDF output, then come to this list (where DBpedia's page directs them) and complain that Wiktionary looks strange, because they think the RDF output is Wiktionary. I added an introductory paragraph that hopefully will reduce this risk.
The Wiktionary community is far smaller and more specialized than the Wikipedia community, and by presenting statistics and arguments, you should be able to influence how Wiktionary works, to facilitate your RDF extraction. For example, if you find some Swedish language templates deviate from a common pattern, just say so, and they can be fixed.