Thus, non-free content, completely useless as content in any Wikimedia project.
I am a bit speechless over the amount of disinformation few of you willing to spread here to prove your point.
Thank you very much!
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 5:22 PM, Gerard Meijssen gerard.meijssen@gmail.com wrote:
Hoi, I quote: "Any person is hereby authorized, without fee, to view, use, reproduce, and distribute all documents and files solely for informational purposes in the creation of products supporting the Unicode Standard, subject to the Terms and Conditions herein."
The point of the copyright is that you are NOT allowed to change modify or whatever is in the standard. You are not and that is entirely how it should be. Thanks, GerardM
On 20 May 2015 at 16:22, Milos Rancic millosh@gmail.com wrote:
Inside of the version 27.0.1, the file main/en.xml starts with:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<!DOCTYPE ldml SYSTEM "../../common/dtd/ldml.dtd">
<!-- Copyright © 1991-2014 Unicode, Inc. CLDR data files are interpreted according to the LDML specification (http://unicode.org/reports/tr35/) For terms of use, see http://www.unicode.org/copyright.html -->
May you tell me is, for example, entry "<language type="akk">Akkadian</language>" PD or not? And explain me where I could find that interpretations inside of http://www.unicode.org/copyright.html ?
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 1:56 PM, Gerard Meijssen gerard.meijssen@gmail.com wrote:
Hoi, I do not understand your question. The use of the standard is free. It is so by definition. The only thing that might be proprietary is the text of the standard itself. There is no problem in using the code. You know it
and
it has always been this way.
As important, there is no credible alternative. Thanks, GerardM
On 20 May 2015 at 10:36, Milos Rancic millosh@gmail.com wrote:
May somebody clarify that Unicode data is free? PD or CC-BY-SA compatible. Or they are not and you are promoting contribution to the proprietary data?
I could see that every file has link to this copyright: http://www.unicode.org/copyright.html
(BTW, I spent significant time of work to incorporate Unicode data into this project, assuming that I am getting here valid information. Which is not the case, obviously.)
On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 10:21 PM, Gerard Meijssen gerard.meijssen@gmail.com wrote:
Hoi, Thank you Minh Gerard
On 26 April 2015 at 20:17, Minh Nguyen mxn@1ec5.org wrote:
On 2015-04-24 08:37, Milos Rancic wrote:
> CLDR is not the right place for that. There are no translations of > languages inside of it. >
There certainly are:
http://www.unicode.org/cldr/charts/27/by_type/locale_display_names.languages...
-- Minh Nguyen mxn@1ec5.org Jabber: mxn@1ec5.org; Blog: http://notes.1ec5.org/
Wiktionary-l mailing list Wiktionary-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiktionary-l
Wiktionary-l mailing list Wiktionary-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiktionary-l
Wiktionary-l mailing list Wiktionary-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiktionary-l
Wiktionary-l mailing list Wiktionary-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiktionary-l
Wiktionary-l mailing list Wiktionary-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiktionary-l
Wiktionary-l mailing list Wiktionary-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiktionary-l